Goodbye Artist

Is photography art? Should we even care? What is art, anyway?

But first: Now that the summer is slowly coming to an end, I hope you have been able to enjoy this life-endorsing season. As for myself, I have been fortunate enough to venture out on many outdoor trips—in mountains, in forests as well as on the sea—and I have read a lot.

It’s the latter I want to write about in this blog post—or what it has lead to. Among other texts, I have read lots of articles, debates, talks and comments from old masters of photography. As so, an address delivered by Paul Strand at the Clarence White School of Photography in 1923 has dramatically changed the way I see myself as a photographer, my view on art and maybe even my photography (though the latter remains to see, I guess) .

That may seem as quite the exaggerated statement, but hear—or read—me out.

Paul Strand was a trend-setting, American photographer in the beginning of the previous century. According to Wikipedia, he, along with fellow modernist photographers like Alfred Stieglitz and Edward Weston, helped establish photography as an art form at the time. As to this day, he is still one of the most recognized artists in the pantheon of photographers. However, he might just have disagreed with this very characterization himself. Or not cared.

Photography has always been a stepdaughter of art. As much as it is recognized as one of many art forms today, it’s still not fully on line with the classic arts such as painting, music, sculpturing, etc. Work by the old masters of photography, such as Paul Strand, are sought after and sold at extremely high prices on auction—but they are still far from what the old masters of the classical disciplines—such as Picasso and Miró, contemporaries of Strand—achieve.

As for myself, as a photojournalist and a documentary photographer, I have always been reluctant to call myself an artist. It just seemed too pretentious. The last many years, though, I have slowly changed my perception and gradually come to terms with myself doing work that is more artistic. In the end, it comes down to a desire to create more personal work—work that could be called art photography.

Now then, in from the past, comes Paul Strand.

In the aforementioned address, he talks to the students of photography (and a hundred years later to me) about what is required to become a photographer: “It involves, first and foremost, a thorough respect and understanding for the particular materials with which he or she is impelled to work, and a degree of mastery over them, which is craftsmanship. And secondly, that indefinable something, the living element which fuses with craftsmanship, the element which relates the product to life and must therefore be the result of a profound feeling and experience of life.”

While craftsmanship is relatively easy to learn, this indefinable something, according to Strand, can’t be taught or given, but develops within yourself by what he calls a free way of living. By that, he means free of conventions, free of other opinions, free of already existing ideas, and not the least free from whatever art is defined as, and, more to the point, free from wanting to become an artist. What is art anyway? Nobody can precisely define it and as it has gotten used in an ever broader meaning, it has at the same time lost its meaning.

“This wanting to be what may truthfully be called an artist, is the last thing in the world to worry about. You either are the thing or you are not.”

Strand has but no respect for the so-called art photographers of the time. At the beginning of the 19th century, pictorialism was the fashionable style. For Strand, this way of making photographs was dishonest, trying to turn photography into something, which it is not, giving it a painterly feeling. He saw it as means to be accepted in what he calls the polite society of artists. These “artists” were doing photography in lack of enough talent to become good painters.

He wants the future photographers he is talking to, to be free, as described above. They should photograph with honesty, honest to themselves. He encourages them to photograph and experiment on their own accord, free from whatever has been or will be installed in them from previous photographers, schools and the future. More than anything, he urges them to forget about art.

“If you really want to paint, then do not photograph, except as you may want to amuse yourself along of the rest of Mr. Eastman’s customers [Eastman was Kodak’s founder]. Photography is not a short cut to painting, being an artist, or anything else.”

Photographers should not try to “make” art, but rather capture good photographs. In doing so, “there are no short cuts, no formulae, no rules, except those of your own living.”

Be as good a photographer as possible, forget being an artist. That is in essence Paul Strand’s message.

He was not alone in this assessment. The same year Edward Weston, another of the modernist photographers of the 19th century, in an interview in New York Times said something alike: “I don’t care about making photography an art. I want to take good photographs. I’d like to know who first got this idea in his head that dreaminess and mist is art. Take things as they are; take good photographs and the art will take care of itself.”

That’s me now. I am a photographer—period. Like a writer is a writer, a painter is a painter, a composer is a composer. Why care about the artist, anyway?


Would you like to get motivating thoughts related to the act of photographing? Every once a month I write Sideways—nuggets of inspiration on photography. Sign up to receive Sideways in your email.


Photo Workshops and Tours in 2023
These are the photo workshops I and Blue Hour Photo Workshops plan for this year.

”Along the Streets of Prague”—five days in the beautiful city of Prague, The Czech Republic. This is a jewel in the middle of Europe with its historical, cultural and human melting pot. September 7th to 10th 2023.

”Photo Tour in Granada”—a week in Nicaragua for the adventures. We will explore the colonial city and its extraordinary countryside. November 5th to 15th 2023.

”On the Tracks of Che Guevara”—ten days in eastern Bolivia. This is a great opportunity to discover one of the most beautiful countries in South America. October 23rd to 31st 2023.

Are you interested in developing your photographic skills? Do you like to travel? Do you want to make your photos tell a story in a much stronger vocabulary? Find your own expression? Develop your vision and become more creative? Any of these workshops would take your photography to the next level. I promise you, you will be in for an amazing experience. Click any of the links for more info.

25 thoughts on “Goodbye Artist

      1. I think I have several roles as a photographer, though I don’t pigeonhole myself by thinking of one role or another when I go out to shoot. As a historian who researches various things, I find that the line between my documentary work and my artistic output can — but not always — get blurred. E.g., in February when I was photographing the aftermath of a storm that left a lot of flooding in “my” little section of Middletown, RI, I wore both hats and sometimes I changed them in a split second. Then I have pictures — I don’t know how to categorize them and you know what, I don’t care. They’ve been fun to take with my iPhone while recovering from rotator cuff injury has ruled out carrying any heavier camera, and people enjoy them; they make people laugh. What are they? I bought a Teddy bear and take him around up in the Catskill mountain villages and photograph him on benches, outside doors and gates, etc. The “Ministry of Humor” :-).

    1. Yes, and no. I think a lot of us like to think of ourselves as artists, which we probably are. My point is really to not worry or even think about it. Be good at the artwork you like to do and then let others worry about whether it’s art or not. And saying that, I also recognize that most of us would appreciate some kind of recognition of the work we do. However, it ought not to be the motivation for our creative endeavours.

      1. It’s a rather loaded term because of so many variations of “what is art?” However, I prefer to keep it simple. If you create something that didn’t exist before and it represents a part of you or the way you feel, then you are an artist and the output is art. That’s it.
        It doesn’t matter what Paul Strand or anyone else says.

  1. Hello Otto,

    I really enjoyed you blog and brought a lot of thinking about photography.

    <

    div style=”direction: ltr;”>Re the workshops: I noticed th

  2. Dear Otto
    The expression that one wants to be a good photographer immediately raises the question of what ‘good’ means. This seems to me to be an unreflective way of avoiding the question of photography and art. So what is a good photographer or a good picture? What means ‘good’ concerning iconographic structures? If photography isn’t art what is it? Is it just documentation?
    Since an image of reality is not reality, alienation is immanent in every image. And here I would see the art aspect of a picture, namely in the way it alienates reality. If an artefact is self-referential according to a modern structural definition, then one can see this self-referentiality in every image, ultimately this is the style of the image.
    For me it seems to be the problem that many photographers are not willing to reflect what they are producing therefore a lot of pictures that are presented especially in social media are cliches.
    Anyway, these are just some ideas I got reading your post.
    All the best
    Klausbernd 🙂

    1. I am not saying photography is not art. It can be, but my point is not to worry or think about it when creating whatever one is creating, but rather concentrate on expressing what is coming from inside.

      Yes, photography is not reality (except the print itself of course is) but a representation of reality (at least when it comes to traditional photography). But more importantly, it’s a reflection of the photographer him- or herself (even when one is oblivious to the fact). When a conscious deliberation of the latter is lacking, photos (and other artworks) often becomes clichés, as you point out.

      What is good then? That is as difficult a question to answer as defining art. For me in this context, it’s not a way to avoid the question of art and photography—or just art. Again, and for me, I would rather concentrate on developing my photography, which is another of way of saying becoming as good as possible.

      I would believe we both can agree to the existence of some gradation of quality in photography and art. There is good and there is bad photography (an example of the latter is the clichés in social media you referred to), although we might not agree to what is what. This is not science and thus not a simple list of checkpoints for what makes a good (or bad) photograph.

      If I didn’t believe there are bad and good photography, there would be no point for me to teach workshops or for anyone to attend a photo education or even try to develop oneself. Discussing bad and good photography is both important in itself and a way to learn about qualities in photography (and art), but I think that is a discussion for another occasion.

      Thank you for your reflections, Klausbern. As always, you make us think.

  3. This post brought up a lot of “stuff” for me. First, the photographs here are very Karsh like to me (you may remember he has long been one of my favourites) so I love them. As a child I always fancied my self as an artist. I was always creating things and painting, etc. My Mother passed when I was 12. Foster care in were I ended up. Let’s just say it was an extremely bad experience. Of my time there the one thing that stuck with me most is the following…We were given a stipend of $10 a month to pay for personal toiletries. I always used mine to by paints, brushes, art pads, etc. The other girls would share their toiletries with me. One day my foster “mother” found my stash of art supplies and creations. She brought us all to the back yard and held up each piece of my “art” and said how bad it was, how untalented I was, what a waste of money it was, and that I had no business spending money on such things, as she lit a match to each one. We all stood there watching my treasures burn. The rest of my formative years were spent trying to figure out how I could use my ideas but not my actual physical ability to create. Then a local photographer from my church put a camera in my hands. I had found my answer. He took me under his wing and I ended up going to college for photography and actually made a living at it. I may still not be as gifted as some, as talented, or an artist, but for me photography was my creative answer to survive in the world. Sorry, about the long story but your post brought it all back.

    1. First of all, thank you for sharing your story, Michelle. It made a deep impression. Having had a quite “normal” childhood myself, in which I could create as much as I wanted, it’s hard to understand that anyone would limit a child’s creative joys. It must have been devastating. All the more, I happy to know that you found an outlet through photography, which I believe still brings as lot of joy for you. As for talent, I have never much paid attention to it. In the end it’s the work you put in that matters, no what talent or not talent you may have been born with.

        1. Likewise, Michelle. I have always appreciated our exchange of ideas and thoughts throughout the years. By the, I was immensely appreciative of your comparison of my photographs to the great Yousuf Karsh, also knowing I would never reach up to the shaft of his boot.

  4. Strand clearly didn’t like the Pictorialists, considering them imitators of painters. I, on the other hand, have often resonated to the glowing mystery I sense in Pictorialist photographs. Chacun à son goût.

    1. I think that is part of what is so interesting about art and artistic work. We don’t have to agree. And there is no right or wrong. We all have to find our way, on our own. And what I have done in this post is only describing the latest turn of my development.

Leave a comment