Do you want to have full control of the flash? Here comes an explanation that will get you on the way to really be able to master the use of flash—at least flash mounted on the camera. There is of course a lot more to flash photography, but that will have to way to another time—and many more posts. This tip here will hopefully without too much work help you understand how you can control the flash in some ways.
Before we start, as you may know; in October last year I started what I called a new instalment for me. On and off I wanted to show and write about simple tips, tips that can improve anyone’s photography. I have written about using long shutter speed to make different photos, I have talked about moving close to the subject to create relationships and I have mentioned how you can using natural reflections—such as sunshine reflected from the streets in through doors—to create beautiful light in your photos.
Alas, I have also had a couple of posts about how to get most out of the camera-mounted flash or the built-in flash on compact cameras. It’s time to take the flash one step further. As written in previous posts you can adjust the amount of flash that is emitted by dialling up or down the flash compensation dial. At the same time you can also adjust the general exposure by the exposure compensation dial where you can make the picture darker or lighter by increments of ⅓ or ½ exposure values (E.V.). The latter will influence both the exposure of the available light as well as the exposure by the flash.
Now this means that you can actually adjust the ratio between the available light and the flash light and thus fine-tune your exposure. This may sound a little complicated, but hopefully it is not. Try to think—when using a combination of both available light and flash—that you are taken two images at once, one with available light and the other with the flash. These two images are then superimposed upon each other (of course this all happens as one exposure in the camera. What I am writing here is just to create a visual image in order to understand how the camera is dealing with the combination of available light and flash).
The flash light has a limited range and will only affect objects closer than one and half to three meters (or yards) away from the flash head depending on the maximum emitted light possible from the flash. The available light, on the other hand, will expose everything within the frame, up front and in the background. Now let’s go back to this idea of two different exposures superimposed upon each other. First the camera takes a photo with the available light and then one, in which it adds the flash (again this is not how it actually happens; it all happens in one take, naturally). Now if the exposure by the available light is correct and makes a perfectly exposed photo, then when you add a flash on top of this the objects that are close enough to be reached by the light from the flash will be overexpose. The rest, further away, will still be perfectly exposed (only by the available light). To compensate for this the camera needs to underexpose the available light on whatever is reached by the light from the flash. However, the camera cannot do this partially, thus everything will be underexposed in the first photo taken only by the available light. And then when you now add the flash, those objects in the reach of the flash will get added light and thus (if everything is correctly added) be properly exposed while the background will be somewhat underexposed—which is generally quit OK.
This is usually done automatically by the camera, and can be used in different ways as I wrote in the previous posts about flash photography.
Now I want to raise the stakes. So far I haven’t been dealing with situations where the available light is different in different parts of the scene. Particularly when the foreground is dark and the background is well illuminated, the use of flash can improve the photo significantly. In this case you can get around the problem by thinking that the background is going to be exposed only by the available light hitting it while the foreground is illuminated by only the flash.
You work it out this way: Figure out the correct exposure for the background. In many ways setting the camera to Manual exposure mode is the simplest in this case, but if don’t want to I suggest selecting Aperture Priority mode (if you have a compact camera set the mode to Slow Sync). You may have to underexpose the subject since the foreground is so dark and will influence the cameras evaluation for a suggested exposure. Maybe start with dialling in –1 E.V. At this point you have a background that is exposed as you want to.
Now it’s time to add the flash. Turn it on. Give it a try without any compensation. Since the foreground is dark, it might be just the perfect exposure. If you are not quite happy with the exposure from the flash, just dial up or down the flash compensation dial till you have what you want. One thing to keep in mind: Sometimes when you are in Aperture Priority mode and turn on the flash the camera will automatically underexpose the general exposure. In this case you will have to compensate for this, by making the available light brighter. For instance, you may have to go from –1 E.V to no compensation at all—or even more like +⅓ E.V. However, since this compensation also will affects the exposure of the light from the flash, you have to do an equal amount of compensation on the flash, but the opposite way. So in the example above, you will either need to set the flash to –1 E.V. or -1⅓ E.V.
The photo above is an example in which I used this technique. I used the available light to expose the background and the sky and then used a flash to light the guy in front. (By the way it’s a photo I have shown before on this blog).
If you have any questions to this technique, please don’t hesitate to ask in comments below. I will answer to the best of my abilities.
For the previous posts on flash photography, please look up: Flash Away the Shadows, A Flashy Look and Flash for the Night.
Facts about the photo: The photo was taken with a Canon T90 camera (with analogue film) and a 24 mm lens. It was captured at ½ a second and f/2.8 (set to expose the background as I wanted it). Flash was added and set to -⅓ E.V. No tripod. Finally the photo was scanned and processed in Lightroom and Photoshop.
Hmmmm, something to work on for sure. I don’t have a lot of instances where I would need flash, but it would be nice to know all this in case I do. Thanks.
I hope this can be of some value, even if you don’t often use a flash. 🙂
It always amuses me when I am in a large stadium to see all the flashes go off from people up near the rafters trying to take photos of the arena area below. I guess I could be kind and say they simply forgot to (or can’t) disable the automatic flash…LOL!
That would indeed be a kind way to look at it. 🙂
I could have done with this about a month ago when I was experimenting with off camera flash. It all sounds relatively easy when reading about it but putting it into practice took a bit of patience! Still, I did OK and have posted a couple of pictures – one more in my next post …
I have noticed you experimenting with flash. And, yes, it does take some practice to get it in the bones, so to speak. Look forward to seeing more pictures with flash.:-)
Thanks you, I will try this.
I hope the method will work for you!
How to is always a good read, even if you think you know!!
That is very true.Thank you, Paula.
Great illustration by using analogy of two images super imposed … that makes it so much easier to visualize how things work out.
I am glad to hear. Thank you. 🙂
i don’t like flash photography, tho i do like the picture at the top of the article, Otto
We don’t all have to like flash photography, do we… 🙂
hope will try it soon!
Let me know how it goes!
Danke guter Beitrag liebe Grüße von mir wünsche dir einen gute und schönen Mittwoch Lieber Gruß Gislinde
Thank you very much, Gislinde.
What pleases me most at this point is that I understood your post! I’ve finally found the E.V. dial on my camera, and figured out two ways to change it. I’ve done that for a few photos, and am beginning to understand its usefulness.
What I didn’t realize is that I can do the same with the flash. When I’m ready to move on to flash, all of these articles will be of great help. Just now, I’m still taking it one step at a time, and the more deliberate approach is helping.
One step at a time is a good strategy for learning. I am glad what I wrote here makes sense. Thank you for the feedback, Linda.
Thank you! This is something I have struggled with, but go too long in between that I always forget how to achieve what I want!
Hopefully this can help you get some control over the flash.
You did great job with this photo, Otto. I try to avoid flash photography, but I’m going to save and read your post again when I have some time to really take it all in. Thanks a lot. 🙂
And thank you for the lovely feedback. 🙂
Otto, I rarely use the flash with the iPhone. But will try it with my DSLR. Thanks for the tip.
It’s hard to control the flash on a cell phone, but with a DSLR you have much more versatility.
Absolutely…
Fantastic and easy to follow explanation…very well done & much appreciated. Have a good night!
Thank you, Mark. Enjoy your evening or whatever it is where you are. 🙂
Good post. It’s always too easy to polarize the background into darkness when you really need to achieve a balance between it and the foreground subject.
Yes, and that is of course the point I am trying to make here. Thanks for the comment, Allan.
Another very informative and helpful article Otto! 🙂
Thank you, Adrian.